Assumed Breach Testing Providers
Assumed breach testing is a targeted security assessment that begins from the premise that an attacker has already gained initial access to the organisation's environment. Instead of spending time on initial compromise (which is covered by traditional pen testing), assumed breach testing focuses on what an attacker can achieve once inside the network.
Testers are given a starting point such as a compromised user workstation, VPN credentials, or access to a specific network segment, and then attempt to escalate privileges, move laterally through the network, access sensitive data, and reach high-value targets or crown jewel assets. This approach directly tests the effectiveness of internal security controls including network segmentation, endpoint detection and response (EDR), privilege access management, monitoring and alerting, and incident response procedures.
Assumed breach testing is highly efficient because it focuses testing time on the most impactful scenarios - the activities an attacker would perform after gaining initial access. It is particularly valuable for organisations that want to test their internal defences and detection capabilities without spending engagement time on perimeter testing. This approach is recommended by NIST and aligns with zero-trust security principles that assume breach as a starting point for security architecture.
Related Rankings
NCC Group
Global cybersecurity consultancy with CREST, CHECK, and CBEST accreditation, renowned for deep technical research and comprehensive penetration testing services.
SECFORCE
Canary Wharf-based adversary simulation and CBEST-aligned penetration testing consultancy, delivering CREST-accredited offensive security to UK financial services and other organisations with the most demanding requirements.
Nettitude
CREST, CHECK, and CBEST accredited UK consultancy within Lloyd's Register, delivering premium penetration testing for government and critical infrastructure.
PwC Cyber Security
Global Big Four professional services firm delivering CREST, CHECK, and CBEST-accredited penetration testing and red teaming services from London, serving the UK's largest enterprises and regulated organisations.
NetSPI
Penetration testing firm trusted by nine of the top ten US banks, with the Resolve platform for continuous attack surface management.
MDSec
Elite UK offensive security consultancy specialising in CBEST/STAR/TIBER red teaming, advanced adversary simulation, and CREST-accredited penetration testing for FTSE 100 clients.
JUMPSEC
Full-service London-based cybersecurity consultancy with CREST, CHECK, and NCSC accreditations delivering offensive testing, managed detection, and strategic advisory services.
Mandiant
World-renowned cybersecurity firm now part of Google Cloud, delivering threat intelligence-led penetration testing and red teaming informed by front-line incident response experience.
Bulletproof
CREST-accredited UK cybersecurity and compliance provider offering penetration testing, managed security services, and regulatory consultancy to over 2,000 customers from its Stevenage headquarters.
GuidePoint Security
US-headquartered cybersecurity consultancy with 800+ employees, serving ~40% of the Fortune 500. FedRAMP 3PAO, PCI QSA, and HITRUST accreditations.
Bishop Fox
Tempe, Arizona-headquartered offensive security firm and Black Hat / DEF CON regulars, makers of the Cosmos continuous attack surface management platform.
Thales Cyber Solutions
Cybersecurity division of the Thales Group, with ANSSI, CREST, FedRAMP 3PAO, and NATO-cleared personnel. Defence, government, and critical infrastructure penetration testing worldwide.
Assumed Breach Testing FAQs
How is assumed breach testing different from internal pen testing?+
Internal pen testing starts with network access and tries to find vulnerabilities from scratch. Assumed breach starts with a simulated compromised endpoint or credentials, focusing specifically on post-compromise activities and detection testing.
What starting points are typical?+
Common starting points include a compromised user workstation, stolen VPN credentials, a phished employee account, or access from a specific network segment. The starting point is chosen to simulate realistic breach scenarios.
Who should consider assumed breach testing?+
Organisations with mature security programmes, EDR solutions, SIEM/SOC capabilities, and network segmentation who want to validate that their internal defences work as expected against a determined attacker.